The Fermi Paradox Explained: Where Is Everybody?

Science · 6 min read · By Dario Seretin · Updated

The universe contains hundreds of billions of galaxies and, in our own Milky Way alone, an estimated 100 to 400 billion stars. Many of those stars have planets. Given so many chances for life to appear, why do we see no evidence of anyone else? This puzzle is called the Fermi paradox, and it is one of the best-known open questions in science. It is also a useful, honest counterweight to the viral claims about an alien arrival that we address in Will Aliens Arrive in 2029?

Where does the name come from?

The question is attributed to the physicist Enrico Fermi. According to accounts from colleagues, in the summer of 1950 Fermi was having lunch at Los Alamos National Laboratory with fellow physicists when the conversation turned to reports of flying saucers and the possibility of interstellar travel. Partway through, Fermi is said to have asked, "Where is everybody?" The remark became shorthand for the contradiction between the high estimated odds of other civilizations and the absence of evidence for them. Michael Hart published an influential 1975 paper arguing that the absence of visitors suggests intelligent life is rare.

The argument in three steps

  1. Many places for life. The Milky Way has hundreds of billions of stars, and surveys show that planets are common. More than 5,000 exoplanets are confirmed, and statistics suggest that a large fraction of stars have planets, including some in the habitable zone.
  2. Plenty of time. The galaxy is roughly 13 billion years old, and our solar system formed about 4.6 billion years ago. Many stars are billions of years older than the Sun, so other civilizations could have had a long head start.
  3. Expansion looks possible. Even at modest fractions of the speed of light, calculations suggest a civilization could spread across the galaxy in a few million years, which is short compared with the age of the galaxy.

Put together, this suggests the galaxy should already be visibly occupied. It does not appear to be.

Possible explanations

There is no consensus answer. Researchers group the proposals roughly like this:

1. They are rare or absent

2. They exist but we cannot see them

3. They are here, or hiding

Ideas such as the "zoo hypothesis" suggest that others deliberately avoid contact. These are not testable with current evidence. Official investigations of unidentified anomalous phenomena have not found verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial technology, as we explain in UFO Sightings Explained.

Is it really a paradox?

Some scientists argue that it is not a paradox but a set of estimates with huge uncertainties. We do not know how likely life is to start, how often it becomes intelligent, or how long technological civilizations last. A 2018 analysis by researchers at the University of Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute argued that, once those uncertainties are properly propagated, it is quite plausible that we are alone in the observable universe. Others disagree. The honest position is that we have one example of life, our own, and cannot yet draw strong statistical conclusions from a sample of one.

How science is trying to answer it

Key takeaways

Sources and further reading

Facts in this article are drawn from public scientific sources. For primary information, see:

Figures can be refined as new observations are published. See our editorial policy for how we write and correct articles.